“The Jack Cram Story
In early 1994 Jack Cram was retained by Renate Andres-Auger, a lawyer and Cree woman, who had challenged the B.C. courts on errors and irregularities of the Delgamuukw case (the Gitksan-Wet’suwet’en case) after Judge McEachern of the Supreme Court of B.C. come down with his trial level decision on the case. She hired Mr. Cram after the Law Society seized her office, books, bank account, and were investigating her without telling her why.
The Law Society of B.C. was attempting to disbar lawyer Renate Andres-Auger. They used a lot of excuses. They seized her accounts and tied it all up with one thing or another and were looking for some kind of excuse in the whole process to close her down. They never were able to come up with anything but they froze her bank account and forced her to close her office.
She had been doing research on the Delgamuukw case and had dug up information that was very damning to the judiciary in that whole process. She had proof that the judge, the crown council, and a couple of the lawyers that were supposedly acting on behalf of the Gitksan-Wet’suwet’en in fact had associations with the same law firm and had conspired to fix the outcome of that “precedent setting” case from the outset.
When Jack Cram saw her evidence and subsequent treatment, he went all out to assist her to uncover more information. Mr. Cram also received instructions from a number of Gitksan Hereditary Chiefs to proceed with a fraud action against both levels of government, the Chief Justice, and Gitksan’s own legal team. Mr. Cram took the information to the court to demand that they release Andres-Auger’s bank account and that she be reinstated as a practising lawyer. Cram also formally alleged massive corruption, and proceeded to file a number of court actions to address this. “
by HENRY MAKOW, PhDhttp://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=106&contentid=5092&page=2
“In 1999, UNESCO named Vancouver one of the world’s top three centers for sex trafficking, child porn and pedophilia because of “suspected judicial protection for child sex offenders.”
In 1994, Renate Andres-Auger, an aboriginal lawyer and single mother of six girls, found irregularities in a land claim case that were very damning to the judicial process. She also charged certain judges and lawyers with a criminal conspiracy to aid and protect pedophiles.
She and her own lawyer Jack Cram presented evidence, including photographs and eye witness accounts that two Supreme Court judges were engaged in pedophilia and were using their office to protect other pedophiles. She named the prestigious “Vancouver Club” as a center of this pedophile ring. (Kevin Annett, Hidden From History: The Canadian Holocaust, p. 147-150)
The Judge ordered Auger removed from the court. “The sheriffs dragged Andres-Auger out of the court and you could hear her thumping down the stairs behind the judge’s bench.” Then the Judge ordered the sheriffs to remove her lawyer Jack Cram. Police were called to clear the courtroom of about 80 supporters. According to a press release, this is what happened when Cram took the cause to the public:
“One night at about 11:30 p.m., after finishing a radio interview, Mr. Cram returned home, parked his car, and while walking to his apartment building five policemen emerged out of the bushes and leaped on him. He was put in an unmarked van and as soon as they got him in they “shot him full of something” and he was transported to the psychiatric ward of Vancouver General Hospital — as a “no information” patient.
SAVING JACK CRAM … (go to the link to continue from here)
“The Cram/Andres-Auger story, to this day, remains a very strange and fearful tale of alleged corruption and pedophilia in high places. It is also a story which has never yet been completely told. Perhaps if it were, along with a few other strange stories, we as Canadians would have little reason to gasp at the exposure of pedophile rings in Belgium operating in high places two years ago. The matter of cover-ups possibly existing for those in high places in Canada is becoming more and more credible as more and more people speak out.”
In 2007 Univ. of Lethbridge professor Anthony Hall commented in Canadian Dimension magazine:
“No public investigation into the treatment and accusations of Andres-Auger and Cram ever took place. We can only speculate, therefore, on the circumstances behind such a dramatic collapse of dignity and due process in the criminal-justice system. Certainly it is made to seem probable that some highly placed group or individual believed that he, she, or they had a great deal to lose if Andres-Auger and Cram had been able to press charges.” “
http://google-law.blogspot.com/2012/12/ … -part.htmlDec 8, 2012 – Then the Judge ordered the sheriffs to remove her lawyer Jack Cram. … “The Cram/Andres-Auger story, to this day, remains a very strange and fearful tale of …
“In 1994, Renate Andres-Auger, an aboriginal lawyer and single mother of six girls, found irregularities in a land claim case that were very damning to the judicial process. She also charged certain judges and lawyers with a criminal conspiracy to aid and protect pedophiles. She and her own lawyer Jack Cram presented evidence, including photographs and eye witness accounts that two Supreme Court judges were engaged in pedophilia and were using their office to protect other pedophiles. She named the prestigious “Vancouver Club” as a center of this pedophile ring.(Kevin Annett, “Hidden From History: The Canadian Holocaust,” p. 147-150)”
“Dr. Maellor Vallance has a long career history of working for various government agencies and institutions in British Columbia. He regularly testifies against average citizens on behalf of the government owned motor vehicle insurance company in British Colubmia. Dr. Maelor Vallance was paid $114,063 in 2004; $110,025 in 2005; and $142,200 in 2006; $120,080 in 2007 and $140,575 in 2008 by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia to asssit it to attempt to defeat claims of injured persons.
After we published this material about Dr. Vallance we were contacted by other people in British Columba who had bad experiences with Dr. Vallance.
If you have any information that confirms or corroborates our suspicion that Dr. Maellor Vallance is a psychiatric hit man who uses his skills to harm people, instead of helping people as he should be doing, then please send it to us.”
“Dead Judges Don’t Lie
This is where things start to get spooky. Eleven crooked judges linked to this one lawsuit suddenly started dying when Mr. Carten started exposing their crimes. Fifteen other key witnesses also suddenly dropped as the case heated up.
In addition, former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau suddenly died in September, 2000, while the rats in Ottawa were jum(*p)ing ship.
The eleven judges were in a postion to blow the whistle on the judicial mafia and how it operates in Canada, especially in British Columbia. Did someone have a motive for murder?
You bet they did.
The dead judges were not the masterminds behind the Water War Crimes. They were merely the footsoldiers directed to attack anyone exposing the Water War Crimes. Their targets were, Sun Belt Water Inc., Aquasource Ltd., Mr. Carten and his family and, collaterally, Ms. Gibbs and her family. The generals in this aspect of the Water War Crimes remain hidden but they are there, nonetheless, and their soldiers, the judges, are expendable. “
“Law Society of BC official James Taylor, who disbarred Andres-Auger and Cram, became a BC Supreme Court judge and issued an injunction in 2002 against mentioning the pedophile charges.
Hall relates how in 1995, when lawyer Bruce Clark tried to make a legal argument on behalf of Aboriginal clients, an incident transpired in a rural B.C. court similar to when Andres-Auger and Cram tried to bring their evidence forward.
The experience of Andres-Auger, Cram, Clark and Annett shows that when it comes to freedom, truth and justice, we live in an hypocritical and decadent society.
One small proof that Cram was not paranoid delusional = on to something = is that BC Provincial Judge Ramsay was eventually convicted of sexual abuse.
Watch the movie “Brotherhood of the Bell” some time … we saw it play out before our eyes
Myself, I say that the Law (less) Society of British Columbia is the very synagogue of Satan … controlled by the FreeMasons. Unbeknownst to Cram, he’d crossed one of its arch-criminals, Christopher Trower.
To try and share the story of Renate Andres-Auger, Jack Cram and Bruce Clark could be considered dangerous in today’s society.
I know Jack Cram personally.
I worked with him on a case in 2004 when he was trying to get back into practicing law.
I learned later that in 2004, Cram admitted to the Law Society of B.C. that “his conduct as counsel on April 22, 1994 had been intemperate and disrespectful to the presiding judge and to the court in general and that it amounted to professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming a member of the Society”.
Basically Cram regretted having said that the court was corrupt, when in fact it was the most truthful statement he had made in his lifetime. However lawyers [owe] allegiance is to the bar and to their colleagues and this includes judges who were once members of the bar.
Cram, knowing how corrupt his profession is, still wanted to get back into it, for the purpose of making more money than his insurance claim of $10,000 a month, which he is to collect until he is 75 years of age. He found himself a psychiatrist that labeled him crazy; but when he was trying to get back in the profession the psychiatrist was prepared to say otherwise.
Jack Cram has the inside track regarding the Law Society and the Judiciary who are aiding and abetting pedophiles and drug dealers; however his loyalty now appears to be more with the profession and with money.
I learned first-hand how Jack Cram operates and I can tell you that it was a great disappointment but certainly a learning curve for me.
Jack Cram had said to me in an email that I was a menace to his profession and I took that as a compliment because my heart is to expose corruption and not try to cover it up.
I wish that Cram would come clean and expose everything he knows. Of course that would mean giving up his insurance money of $10,000.00 a month.
If you want to post this, you may because what I wrote is based on truth and not meant to be malicious in any way because in truth I want Jack Cram to tell the truth and let Canadians know how corrupt our country really is.
“No public investigation into the treatment and accusations of Andres-Auger and Cram ever took place. We can only speculate, therefore, on the circumstances behind such a dramatic collapse of dignity and due process in the criminal-justice system. Certainly it is made to seem probable that some highly placed group or individual believed that he, she, or they had a great deal to lose if And-res-Auger and Cram had been able to press charges.What’s more, the accusations of the two lawyers merged with a powerful stream of allegations by critics who charged that rampant corruption and conflicts of interest permeated the entire proceedings of the $27-million federally funded test case to determine the legal status of Aboriginal title in the lands and water of B.C. Cram was deeply involved in this controversy. At the time Cram tried to represent Andres-Auger, he was also beginning to act for Gitskan Indian clients who charged that their own lawyers had committed fraud against them. That pivotal case began with the assertion that the hereditary leaders of the Gitskan and Wet’suwet’en Indians continued to be the legitimate governors in a large area of the B.C. interior. The case would eventually emerge in 1997 as the basis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Delgamuukw ruling.”
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:12 pm
The Delgamuukw court case has important implications for the history of Canada and for the idea of history itself. In this case the court gave greater weight to oral history than to written evidence. Of oral histories the court said “they are tangential to the ultimate purpose of the fact-finding process at trial — the determination of the historical truth.”
In A Fair Country, John Ralston Saul writes about the broader significance of the court’s recognition of oral evidence as carrying as much or greater weight as written evidence, on Canadian society.
The only legal difficulty with Saul’s perception is that oral history is not relevant to the definition of the Indian Tribes’ constitutional interest, that being determined by the paramountcy clause section 109 of the Constitution Act, 1867, as settled by the precedents St Catherine’s Milling and Lumber Co. v. The Queen, and Attorney General of Canada v. Attorney General of Ontario: In re Indian Claims, Those cases held the Indian constitutional “Interest” is paramount over the Crown’s constitutional “Interest” until surrendered by treaty, that being the legal consequence of the treaty process in Canada.